home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- ENVIRONMENT, Page 81No Home for Hot Trash
-
-
- A U.S. nuclear dump is delayed
-
-
- Nuclear waste is nasty stuff. The inevitable by-product of
- all atomic-power plants, it remains radioactive for up to 3
- million years and necessitates heavy shielding to protect any
- human or animal life that may come near it. The U.S. Congress
- believed it had conquered the problem of where to put such waste
- when in 1987 it ordered the Department of Energy to focus on
- building a national dump site in Nevada. By 2003, the Government
- promised, spent fuel from the country's 110 commercial nuclear
- reactors would be trundled across states and safely buried deep
- within Yucca Mountain, an isolated peak about 100 miles
- northwest of Las Vegas. But that forecast, like an earlier one
- predicting a national dump site by 1998, proved too rosy. Last
- week energy officials pushed back the opening to at least 2010.
-
- Deputy Energy Secretary Henson Moore claims that the
- revised schedule is necessary to satisfy scientific and
- environmental concerns. "This is in fact a realistic reappraisal
- rather than a delay," he says. But to critics, it is yet another
- sign of bureaucratic bungling. Two years and $500 million into
- the Yucca project, the federal agency appears to have
- accomplished little. John Tuck, Under Secretary of Energy,
- conceded last week that the department did not have a
- "scientifically sound plan" for assessing the site's suitability
- as a dump.
-
- Nevada citizens, environmentalists and scientists are
- adamantly opposed to the Yucca site. They contend that the area
- is geologically insecure: Lathrop Wells volcano is twelve miles
- away, and Nevada ranks just behind Alaska and California in
- frequency of earthquakes. As a result, Nevada has refused to
- issue the environmental permits needed for a study of the site.
- The DOE announced last week that it has asked the Justice
- Department to file suit against the state.
-
- For the nuclear-power industry, which has been hoping for
- a rebirth with a new generation of safer reactors, the DOE's
- latest postponement appears to be a heavy blow. But the industry
- professes to be unperturbed. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission
- has said it will not delay licensing future nuclear plants as
- long as it looks as if a waste repository will be in operation
- within the first quarter of the next century. Given the
- Government's record so far, even that target may prove to be a
- problematic one.
-
-